Feed on
Posts
comments

Project reflection

Why did I choose Online Convergent Journalism? I was recommended by my classmate who studied this subject before, she said it is an interesting subject and her classmates are talent and professional, and to be frankly, no examination always is our concern. Also, me as an international student, work with local students is the experience that I want to have. However, students naturally group with their same nationality, this was my last semester, just a disappointed that I have never been a chance to work with local students.

I came from design background; I’ve to admit that my writing is thumb down. Online Convergent Journalism was a very new subject for me; I thought it was about media technology and from the unit outline, I’ll learn how to report, write, record and deliver news across a range of media. To manipulate the media software won’t be a problem but only English writing skill would be my objective because it acquires a range of writing and publishing practices.

I was amazed by the classmates; they are local students and their professional in the relevant field. I observed and sense the enthusiastic they have show from their knowledgeable. I especially enjoyed the session to write hard news stories. I just realized the importance of the clever headline, the lead and some basic rules for the content. Other than that, this subject widens my eyes to understand more about journalism. They inspired me to pay more attention on reading and writing a journal. I do respect and appreciate the creative talent journalist more.

Journalist influence people, nowadays, journalist might have more challenge in this rapid evolution of new media; on print, TV, radio, internet and anything touching communication. In fact, the more freedom of the journalism has more variety.

As I studied user experiences before, I understood the significance from the user point of view. To observe someone using our website is quite interesting, everyone’s aspect is quite different, what we actually need is improve our website in order to achieve the user friendly, efficiency, accessibility and interactivity of our website. Learning from people is a good lesson.

Moreover, the quality of the content is the soul from the website; but it also depends on the purpose and the target audience for the website. For example, the Age, as a user point of view, I would concern the accuracy, truth and the efficiency of the news report. Otherwise, I wouldn’t be back to the website again and the value of the website is lost.

Finally, I personally like this subject a lot, I like the first half classes instead of teaching software part, because that was something about creativity and interaction with people, I like to see how people interpret and express their ideas, more debate is also interesting. I was delighted to study this subject and thank you Lisa, I do learn a lot from you & I love your smiling and your enthusiastic as well.

All the best

: )

This is my personal blog since I came to Australia 2 years ago, although it is a Chinese website, but it’s not hard to read – http://hk.myblog.yahoo.com/tamanatt

delicious.com

I uploaded my bookmark to delicious, it’s quite a funny website, but the problem was I need to re catagorize the bookmark manually for hundreds of the links …

Artscape: Not Quite Art

I’m not very good in English or I still not very familiar with Australia culture, but this is a very interesting program about how a new generation of Australian artists and audiences changed their culture, their unit creativity and the unimaginable influences by using the new technology nowadays are so impact.

Probably people might get used to their own culture and environment and started shifting their eye sight outside the global. Something might observe as very ordinary to us but others might see as extraordinary (the title of the program – culture shock). Suddenly, million of audiences were attracted by just an ordinary lady who has her regular writing on blog, a music performance video posted on you tube from an isolated island and a computer game geek had his career… who knows? The culture is just funny or ridicules, right?

Yes, technology not only break through the geographic barriers but the communication and transformation of the multi culture. However, the contradiction of the result what brings out by the technology could be a concern because we never seen the negative influences to our future.  For example from my country, so far we can only see the negative news from people who are addicting to the computer games or blogs rather than they really well used the technology to build up their strength and talents. I actually feel impressed by those interviewer.

How the technology changing art in Australian? or it could be the same as the other countries.

10 Sept 08 Multimedia Storytelling exercise

Multimedia story: Beijing Beat
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/world/interactives/beijingbeat/index.html?hpid=multimedia2&hpv=national

Explore the story and then consider the following:

  1. How well does the site use navigation?

The site is pretty simple and straight forward, apart from the top main navigation, the pictures has been design as navigation buttons as user friendly.

2. How effectively is it designed?

Thinks that there is no design on this page, simple, no graphics, not colourful and seems purpose on bringing the audience focus on content only.

3. How effectively does it use photos, graphics, broadcast and interactive elements? List the elements that are present.

Overall the elements are keeping very consistence. The photos have been designed as navigation with mouse event, clear and objective. No graphics, Videos are very well navigated by the picture buttons. Always keep the users on the centre of the page; the advantage could be users won’t get lost and very focusing on the content. Finally, I feel like the main visual as the broadcast is not attractive, a bit static, boring and the objects are about the house’s roofs, no meaning at all.

4. How well are the stories written/presented/packaged?

It depends, I personally like short article, better visually designed with videos or pictures. The refection of the society and real stories from the videos with short descriptions are plenty enough to tell what they want to say , very simple and get to the point.

5. What did you love about it? Hate about it? Why?

I dislike this website because there’s no design and just boring, but again, it depends the purpose and the target audiences for this website. I like this website because I think they achieve the purpose as a newspaper website; content is everything, rich content keep audience, if I’m just focus on the news, I wouldn’t much care about the design but the minium requirement is simple and readable.

Published: June 8, 2008

A 61-year-old woman elbows her 5-foot-2-inch frame to the front of the crowd mobbing Bill Clinton after a campaign event in South Dakota. As Mr. Clinton shakes her hand and holds it tight, she deftly draws him into a response to an article on the Vanity Fair Web site that examines his post-presidential life. “Sleazy” and “slimy” are among the words that issue from the former president’s mouth. Within hours, audio of the three-minute exchange — including the woman’s description of the article as a “hatchet job,” and Mr. Clinton’s description of Todd Purdum, the author and a former reporter for The New York Times, as “dishonest” — is available for the world to hear on the Huffington Post Web site.

Which might have caught Mr. Clinton by surprise.

The woman, Mayhill Fowler, who calls herself a citizen journalist, wore no credential around her neck and did not identify herself, her intentions or her affiliation as an unpaid contributor to Off the Bus, a section of The Huffington Post. While her digital audio recorder was visible in her left hand during that encounter last Monday, she says, she did not believe Mr. Clinton saw it. “I think we can safely say he thought I was a member of the audience,” she said in a telephone interview on Friday.

The incident, widely mined on the cable news channels as fresh evidence of Mr. Clinton’s volcanic temper in the waning hours of his wife’s presidential campaign, has prompted an entirely different discussion — this one among political reporters, journalism teachers, public relations strategists and bloggers themselves — about the dos and don’ts of ethical reporting in the YouTube age.

Among the questions posed last week was this: in an era when anyone with a cellphone and wi-fi connection can make like Tom Brokaw, do the long-accepted conventions of engagement (like a reporter’s volunteering who she is without being asked) still apply?

“This makes it very difficult for the rest of us to do our jobs,” Jonathan Alter, a columnist and political reporter for Newsweek, said in an interview. “If you don’t have trust, you don’t get good stories. If someone comes along and uses deception to shatter that trust, she has hurt the very cause of a free flow of public information that she claims she wants to assist.”

“You identify yourself when you’re interviewing somebody,” Mr. Alter added. “It’s just a form of cheating not to.”

But to Jane Hamsher, a onetime Hollywood producer who founded Firedoglake, a politics-oriented Web site that tilts left, Mr. Alter’s rules of the road are in need of repaving. For starters, she said, the onus was on Mr. Clinton to establish who Ms. Fowler was before deciding to speak as he did. That he failed to quiz her at all, Ms. Hamsher said, was Mr. Clinton’s problem, not Ms. Fowler’s. As a result, Ms. Hamsher said, the public got to experience the unplugged musings of a former president (and candidate’s spouse) in a way that might never have been captured on tape by an old boy on the bus like Mr. Alter.

“It’s hurting America that journalists consider their first loyalty to be to their subjects, and not to the people they’re reporting for,” she said. Told, for example, that the Times ethics policy states that “staff members should disclose their identity to people they cover (whether face to face or otherwise),” Ms. Hamsher was dismissive. In the context of political reporting, she said, such guidelines are intended to “protect this clubby group of journalists and their high-ranking political subjects, and keep access to themselves.”

“That,” she added, “is not the world we’re living in anymore.”

Ms. Fowler, it turns out, is the same person who used her status as a contributor to the campaign of Senator Barack Obama (something disclosed on the Huffington site) to gain access in April to an Obama fundraiser in San Francisco that the mainstream news media was not invited to. Here again, her digital recorder picked up an incendiary remark — Mr. Obama saying of some economically frustrated Pennsylvanians, “It’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion.”

Kelly McBride, leader of the ethics group at the Poynter Institute, a training center for print and television reporters (and more recently those online) said she saw merit in Ms. Fowler’s work, but cause for concern, too.

“On the one hand, when political candidates are so polished and put together, with their images so crafted for the rest of the universe, I think it’s good for democracy that it’s harder for them to maintain that because of citizen journalism,” Ms. McBride said. “But I also worry that as citizens take on the role of journalists, the amount of trickery will escalate — the sort of baiting of people and egging them on.”

Ms. Fowler, who has worked as a teacher and written fiction, had no experience as a professional journalist before joining the campaign trail a year ago. Eventually, she came to the attention of Off the Bus, a joint project of Arianna Huffington and Jay Rosen, a media critic and professor of journalism at New York University. The idea is to pair motivated amateurs like Ms. Fowler with professional editors like Marc Cooper. Mr. Cooper, the project’s editorial director, has been a contributing editor for The Nation for more than a decade and an occasional contributor to The Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post and other publications.

“All the rules of the game that we’ve been teaching in journalism school, it’s not that they’re immoral or bad or wrong, it’s that they just changed, my friend,” said Mr. Cooper, who teaches reporting at the Annenberg School of Communication at the University of Southern California. “We didn’t even do it conspicuously. The rules of the game have been redefined by technology. We’re merely the instrument of that.”

Still, Mr. Rosen said he remained concerned that Ms. Fowler had not tried, in the span of a conversation that lasted several minutes, to alert the former president to who she was. (Speaking Friday, she said she had her Off the Bus business card in hand moments before meeting Mr. Clinton, but somehow lost it before she could give it to him.)

“In the interest of full disclosure, it would have been better if she said, ‘Mr. President, I’m a blogger from Off the Bus and I have a question,’ ” Mr. Rosen said. “I also understand the situation she’s in, he’s on a rope line, and it’s crowded and there are people shouting at him.”

“We didn’t anticipate exact circumstances like this,” Mr. Rosen added. “We didn’t think up guidelines for what to tell her in a situation like this.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/08/weekinreview/08steinberg.html

Faker

I personally had no interested in Journalism from my country – Hong Kong. The only way to keep them alive could be a faker and a invader. Ironically, the supporters are our Hong Kong citizen.

I’m not familiar about the Journalists in Australia, but wish that the culture here won’t be like the asian countries.

Week 3 Class Activity

A funny practice for our class 3, here’s our group’s filming. Thanks for the team members Anh & Ahmad